Issue Watch

About Us

The definitive online source for examining worldwide public opinion and democratic processes.

The Global Monitor is a vital source of timely political intelligence for journalists, students, policy makers, and citizens. By merging academic expertise with the highest journalistic standards, we seek to advance research, improve information exchange, and enhance understanding of the changing dynamic of public opinion and democracy.
Read More

Contact Us

Mario Canseco
Vice President, Public Affairs, Angus Reid Public Opinion
#700 - 858 Beatty St
Vancouver, BC, V6B 1C1
T: 604.647.3570
F: 604.647.1005
mario.canseco@angus-reid.com

Powered By Angus Reid Public Opinion

Lula Keeps Extraordinary Rating in Brazil

March 06, 2010

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva heads to the final months of his tenure with impressive numbers, according to a poll by Datafolha published in Folha de Sao Paulo. 73 per cent of respondents rate Lula’s performance as good or very good.

Lula—a member of the Worker’s Party (PT)—won the October 2002 presidential election with 61 per cent of the vote in a run-off against Jose Serra of the Brazilian Party of Social Democracy (PSDB). In October 2006, he earned a new four-year term, defeating PSDB candidate Geraldo Alckmin with 60.8 per cent of the vote in the second round. Lula is ineligible for a third consecutive term in office.

In 2006, Lula’s party was affected by a series of corruption scandals. The socialist-leaning president—also a former union leader—led a strong economy with conservative fiscal policies during his first mandate, and was praised for his poverty-reduction initiatives.

Yesterday, Lula discussed his views on how to deal with Iran’s nuclear program, declaring, "It is not wise to push Iran into a corner. It is wise to establish negotiations."

The first round of Brazil’s presidential election is scheduled for Oct. 3.

Polling Data

How would you rate the performance of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva as president?

 

Feb. 2010

Dec. 2009

Aug. 2009

Good / Very Good

73%

72%

67%

Average

20%

21%

25%

Bad / Very Bad

5%

6%

8%

Source: Datafolha / Folha de Sao Paulo
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 2,624 Brazilian adults, conducted on Feb. 24 and Feb. 25, 2010. Margin of error is 2 per cent.