Issue Watch
Track global public opinion on current issues.
- 2008: Race for the White House
- 2008: The U.S. Electoral College
- Abortion
- Africa
- Angela Merkel
- Death Penalty
- Economy and Globalization
- Environment
- European Union
- George W. Bush
- Global Warming
- Gordon Brown
- Hamas
- Immigration
- Iran
- Iraq War
- Kevin Rudd
- Latin America
- New Zealand Election 2008
- Nicolas Sarkozy
- North Korea
- Oil and Gas
- Same-Sex Marriage
- Silvio Berlusconi
- Stem Cell Research
- Stephen Harper
- Terrorism
- U.S. Election 2008 - The Democrats
- U.S. Election 2008 - The Republicans
- U.S. Election 2008: The Primaries
- Vladimir Putin
- Yasuo Fukuda
Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research
Americans Back Multilateral Solutions
(CPOD) Oct. 3, 2003 - The policy of multilateralism is favored by Americans to settle international disputes, according to a poll by Zogby International released by the Foreign Policy Association. 66 per cent of respondents believe diplomacy should be used in crisis areas.
As far as actual altercations in the world, more than half of respondents would prefer a joint effort with the United Nations (UN) and other allied countries to deal with problems in North Korea, Iraq, Liberia and the Middle East. Support is lower for reducing the power of Colombian drug cartels.
Despite the unilateral approach taken before the Iraqi war, 59 per cent of respondents say the UN is needed more than ever.
Polling Data
I am going to read to you two policies. Please tell me which policy comes closer to your own view - A or B? Policy A favors diplomacy over strategic power in international disputes, and actively seeks out the assistance of international bodies like the United Nations and NATO to work together with the U.S. in crisis areas. Policy B favors the U.S. acting alone if necessary, and playing the role of both moral force and superpower in such disputes, all with the intention of protecting U.S. interests.
Policy A / Multilateralism | 66% |
Policy B / Unilateralism | 29% |
How should the U.S. deal with these issues --seek help from the United Nations (UN) and allies, do whatever it takes to solve the problems or leave alone?
Help from | Whatever | Leave | |
Handling the nuclear weapons development in North Korea | 68% | 23% | 7% |
Securing peace and a transition to local leadership in Iraq | 67% | 22% | 9% |
Reducing violence and facilitating a leadership change in Liberia | 60% | 11% | 23% |
Negotiating peace and stability in the Israeli-Palestinian dispute | 56% | 18% | 25% |
Reducing the power of the drug cartels in Colombia | 41% | 36% | 19% |
Some argue that the United Nations has been reduced in its influence and is less relevant today in global matters. Others say that the UN is needed now more than ever to represent a global perspective in issues that arise. Which of those statements comes closer to your own views?
UN needed more than ever | 59% |
UN is less relevant | 34% |
Source: Zogby International / Foreign Policy Association
Methodology: Interviews to 1,000 likely American voters, conducted from Sept. 5 to Sept. 9, 2003. Margin of error is 3.2 per cent.
Today's Global Monitor Polls & Research
- ANC Wrong to Recall Mbeki, Say South Africans
- Slovenians Happy with Election Results
- U.S. 2008: Obama 49.3%, McCain 43.1%
- Two-in-Five Malaysians Would Vote for Obama
- Australians Urge Action on Japan’s Whaling
- Russians Want to Find Path for Change
- Hawaii: Obama 68%, McCain 27%
- Vermont: Obama 60%, McCain 36%
- Brazilians Overwhelmingly Backing Lula
- Tories Would Expand Private Care, Say Canadians
Archive Search
Over 19,300 Polls
Search the Angus Reid Global Monitor Polls & Research archive.