Issue Watch

About Angus Reid Global Monitor

The definitive online source for examining worldwide public opinion and democratic processes.

The Global Monitor is a vital source of timely political intelligence for journalists, students, policy makers, and citizens. By merging academic expertise with the highest journalistic standards, we seek to advance research, improve information exchange, and enhance understanding of the changing dynamic of public opinion and democracy.
Read More

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

All fields are required.

Lula Keeps Stable Rating in Brazil

July 10, 2007

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva remains popular in the country, according to a poll by Ibope. 50 per cent of respondents consider Lula has done a good or very good job leading the government, up one point since April.

Lula—a member of the Worker's Party (PT)—won the October 2002 presidential election with 61 per cent of the vote in a run-off against Jose Serra of the Brazilian Party of Social Democracy (PSDB). In October 2006, he earned a new four-year term, defeating PSDB candidate Geraldo Alckmin with 60.8 per cent of the vote in the second round.

In 2006, the president's party was affected by a series of corruption scandals. The socialist-leaning president—also a former union leader—led a strong economy with conservative fiscal policies during his first mandate.

On Jul. 9, Lula defended Brazil's thriving sugar cane-based ethanol industry and rebuffed claims that its production could hurt the Amazon rainforest, saying, "The Portuguese discovered a long time ago that the Amazon isn't a place to plant cane. (...) The cartel of the world's powerful is trying to prevent Brazil from developing, trying to prevent Brazil from being transformed into a great nation."

Polling Data

How would you rate the performance of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva as president?

Jul. 2007

Apr. 2007

Dec. 2006

Good / Very Good

50%

49%

57%

Fair

33%

33%

28%

Bad / Very Bad

16%

16%

13%

Source: Ibope
Methodology: Interviews with 2,002 Brazilian adults, conducted from Jun. 28 to Jul. 1, 2007. Margin of error is 2.2 per cent.