Issue Watch

About Angus Reid Global Monitor

The definitive online source for examining worldwide public opinion and democratic processes.

The Global Monitor is a vital source of timely political intelligence for journalists, students, policy makers, and citizens. By merging academic expertise with the highest journalistic standards, we seek to advance research, improve information exchange, and enhance understanding of the changing dynamic of public opinion and democracy.
Read More

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

All fields are required.

Michigan U.S. Senate: Stabenow 50%, Bouchard 44%

November 07, 2006

- Michigan Democrat Debbie Stabenow could earn a new six-year term in the United States Senate, according to the latest poll by Strategic Vision. 50 per cent of respondents in the Great Lake State would vote for Stabenow in the election, while 44 per cent would support Republican Mike Bouchard.

An early November poll by SurveyUSA gave Stabenow a ten-point edge over Bouchard. Green Party candidate David Sole, Libertarian candidate Leonard Schwartz and U.S. Taxpayers Party candidate Dennis FitzSimons are also contending.

Stabenow was elected to the U.S. Senate in 2000, defeating incumbent Republican Spencer Abraham by almost 43,000 votes. Stabenow—who served in the Michigan House of Representatives for 11 years and for two terms in the U.S. House of Representatives—is currently the third-ranking Democrat in the U.S. Senate.

Bouchard is the Oakland County sheriff, and had previously served as the State Senate majority leader. On Aug. 8, he defeated former Detroit councilman Keith Butler in the GOP primary with 60.5 per cent of the vote.

The election is will take place today. No Republican has represented Michigan in the U.S. Senate since Stabenow defeated Abraham.

Polling Data

Election 2006 - Michigan U.S. Senate

Incumbent: Debbie Stabenow (D)
Challengers: Mike Bouchard (R), David Sole (G), Leonard Schwartz (L) Dennis FitzSimons (UST)

Stabenow (D)

Bouchard (R)

Date

Methodology

MofE

Strategic Vision

50%

44%

Nov. 2-4

Phone, 1,200 LV

3.0

SurveyUSA

52%

42%

Nov. 2-4

Phone, 687 LV

3.8

Selzer & Co.

53%

34%

Oct. 31-Nov. 2

Phone, 532 LV

4.3

EPIC/MRA

51%

38%

Oct. 30-Nov. 2

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Mason-Dixon

53%

37%

Oct. 31-Nov. 1

Phone, 625 LV

4.0

EPIC/MRA

51%

38%

Oct. 30-Nov. 1

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Strategic Vision

49%

42%

Oct. 29-31

Phone, 1,200 LV

3.0

Zogby Interactive

49%

42%

Oct. 23-27

Online, 1,201 LV

2.9

EPIC/MRA

50%

38%

Oct. 22-25

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Research 2000

52%

41%

Oct. 23-24

Phone. 600 LV

4.0

SurveyUSA

51%

44%

Oct. 22-24

Phone, 803 LV

3.5

Lake Research Partners

53%

35%

Oct. 21-23

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Rasmussen Reports

55%

39%

Oct. 22

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Strategic Vision

49%

42%

Oct. 20-23

Phone, 1,200 LV

3.0

Selzer & Co.

48%

35%

Oct. 8-11

Phone, 643 LV

3.9

SurveyUSA

53%

42%

Oct. 6-8

Phone, 772 LV

3.6

EPIC/MRA

48%

35%

Oct. 3-4

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

SurveyUSA

54%

41%

Sept. 15-17

Phone, 749 LV

3.7

Strategic Vision

51%

44%

Sept. 15-17

Phone, 1,200 LV

3.0

EPIC/MRA

53%

34%

Sept. 7-12

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Rasmussen
Reports

51%

43%

Aug. 31

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Strategic
Vision

49%

42%

Aug. 25-27

Phone, 1,200 LV

3.0

EPIC/MRA

51%

38%

Aug. 21-22

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Zogby
Interactive

49%

45%

Aug. 15-21

Online, 1,011 LV

3.1

SurveyUSA

51%

42%

Aug. 19-21

Phone, 988 LV

3.2

EPIC/MRA

54%

42%

Aug. 9-14

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Rasmussen
Reports

49%

44%

Aug. 10

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

LV: Likely voters
RV: Registered voters
Ad: Adults
MofE: Margin of error

Previous polls from this race