Issue Watch

About Angus Reid Global Monitor

The definitive online source for examining worldwide public opinion and democratic processes.

The Global Monitor is a vital source of timely political intelligence for journalists, students, policy makers, and citizens. By merging academic expertise with the highest journalistic standards, we seek to advance research, improve information exchange, and enhance understanding of the changing dynamic of public opinion and democracy.
Read More

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

All fields are required.

Missouri U.S. Senate: McCaskill 50%, Talent 44%

November 07, 2006

- Claire McCaskill could win Missouri's election to the United States Senate, according to the latest poll by SurveyUSA. 50 per cent of respondents in the Show Me State would vote for the Democratic challenger, while 44 per cent would support Republican incumbent Jim Talent.

An early November survey by Rasmussen Reports gave Talent a one-point edge over McCaskill. Libertarian Party candidate Frank Gilmour and Lydia Lewis of the Green Party are also contending.

Talent was first elected to the U.S. Senate in a 2002 special election, defeating Democrat Jean Carnahan—the widow of former governor Mel Carnahan—with 52 per cent of all cast ballots. Talent had previously served in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1993 to 2001.

McCaskill has served as Missouri's state auditor since 1998. She lost the 2004 gubernatorial election to Republican Matt Blunt by 2.9 percentage points.

The election will take place today. Aside from Carnahan, no Democrat has represented Missouri in the U.S. Senate since Thomas F. Eagleton in 1987.

Polling Data

Election 2006 - Missouri U.S. Senate

Incumbent: Jim Talent (R)
Challenger: Claire McCaskill (D), Frank Gilmour (L)

Tal. (R)

McCa. (D)

Gilm. (L)

Date

Methodology

MofE

SurveyUSA

44%

50%

3%

Nov. 4-6

Phone, 793 LV

3.9

Rasmussen Reports

49%

48%

--

Nov. 5

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Gallup

45%

49%

--

Nov. 1-4

Phone, 917 LV

4.0

Mason-Dixon

45%

46%

--

Nov. 1-3

Phone, 625 LV

4.0

Rasmussen Reports

48%

49%

--

Nov. 2

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Zogby / Reuters

43%

46%

--

Oct. 24-31

Phone, 600 LV

4.0

Rasmussen Reports

47%

48%

--

Oct. 30

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

SurveyUSA

46%

49%

2%

Oct. 28-30

Phone, 525 LV

4.4

Opinion Research Corporation

49%

49%

--

Oct. 26-29

Phone, 565 LV

4.0

Research 2000

47%

47%

2%

Oct. 23-26

Phone, 800 LV

3.5

Rasmussen Reports

48%

46%

--

Oct. 24

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

SurveyUSA

48%

45%

2%

Oct. 21-23

Phone, 630 LV

4.0

Bloomberg / LA Times

48%

45%

--

Oct. 20-23

Phone, 593 LV

4.0

Mason-Dixon

43%

46%

--

Oct. 17-19

Phone, 625 LV

4.0

Zogby Interactive

50%

47%

2%

Oct. 10-16

Online, 1,005 LV

3.1

Rasmussen Reports

43%

42%

--

Oct. 12

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Bennett, Petts & Blumenthal

43%

48%

--

Oct. 9-11

Phone, 800 RV

3.5

SurveyUSA

42%

51%

3%

Oct. 9-11

Phone, 497 LV

4.5

Zobgy / Reuters

43%

39%

--

Sept. 25-Oct. 2

Phone, 601 LV

4.5

Gallup

45%

48%

--

Sept. 27-Oct. 1

Phone, 577 LV

5.0

Mason-Dixon

43%

43%

--

Sept. 24-27

Phone, 625 RV

4.0

Zogby Interactive

48%

47%

--

Sept. 19-25

Online, 1,015 LV

3.1

SurveyUSA

47%

48%

1%

Sept. 11-13

Phone, 468 LV

4.6

Rasmussen
Reports

42%

45%

--

Sept. 12

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Research 2000

46%

47%

2%

Aug. 28-31

Phone, 800 LV

3.5

Gallup50%44%--Aug. 23-27Phone, 574 LV3.5

Zogby
Interactive

50%

45%

--

Aug. 15-21

Online, 831 LV

3.4

Rasmussen
Reports

46%

44%

--

Aug. 15

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

SurveyUSA

46%

47%

2%

Aug. 12-14

Phone, 464 LV

4.6

Rasmussen
Reports

42%

45%

--

Jul. 20

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Rasmussen
Reports

42%

42%

--

Jun. 27

Phone, 500 LV

4.5

Zogby
Interactive

49%

44%

--

Jun. 13-19

Online, 847 LV

3.6

LV: Likely voters
RV: Registered voters
Ad: Adults
MofE: Margin of error

Previous polls from this race