<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Angus Reid Public Opinion - North Korea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.angus-reid.com/issue/north-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.angus-reid.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:36:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Nix War Against North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39460/americans_nix_war_against_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39460/americans_nix_war_against_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/americans_nix_war_against_north_korea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many adults in the United States are not in favour of a military invasion of North Korea in the event of a war in the Korean Peninsula, according to a poll by Angus Reid Public Opinion. 46 per cent of respondents oppose this course of action. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Many adults in the United States are not in favour of a military invasion of North Korea in the event of a war in the Korean Peninsula, according to a poll by Angus Reid Public Opinion. 46 per cent of respondents oppose this course of action.
</p>
<p>
Diplomatic relations between the North and South have been strained since the end of the Korean War. A one-mile demilitarized zone has separated the two countries since 1953. About 28,000 American troops are currently stationed in South Korea.
</p>
<p>
Kim Jong-il has been the de-facto leader of North Korea since the death of his father, Kim Il Song, in 1994. North Korea was branded as part of an &quot;axis of evil&quot; by then United States president George W. Bush in January 2002. In February 2005, the government of North Korea admitted publicly for the first time that it possesses nuclear weapons.
</p>
<p>
The Government of South Korea has accused North Korea of using a torpedo to sink a ship in March, killing 46 South Korean sailors. North Korea has denied the allegations, and claims that South Korea manipulated the results of its own investigation.
</p>
<p>
On Jul. 27, Democratic Massachusetts Senator John Kerry called on the U.S. government to engage in direct talks with North Korea, saying, &quot;The underlying security challenges have kept the Korean Peninsula locked in a Cold War for far too long, even as we are fully prepared to deter and defend against any North Korean aggression, a fact underscored by upcoming joint military exercises and the delay of the planned transfer of wartime operational control to South Korea.&quot;
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
If a war breaks out between North Korea and South Korea, would you support or oppose the U.S. Government authorizing a military invasion of North Korea with the aim of removing the North Korean Government?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7" width="none" dir="ltr">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61%"><span></p>
<p>
			Support
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="39%"><span></p>
<p>
			36%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%"><span></p>
<p>
			Oppose
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="39%"><span></p>
<p>
			46%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%"><span></p>
<p>
			Not sure
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="39%"><span></p>
<p>
			18%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span><em></p>
<p>
Source: Angus Reid Public Opinion <br />
Methodology: Online interviews with 1,013 American adults, conducted on Aug. 1 and Aug. 2, 2010. Margin of error is 2.2 per cent.
</p>
<p></em></p>
<p>
<a href="http://bit.ly/aR1EJR">Complete Poll (PDF)</a>
</p>
<p><u><font color="#ffff00"></p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p></font></u></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39460/americans_nix_war_against_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Americans Remain Opposed to Authorizing War Against North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43182/most-americans-remain-opposed-to-authorizing-war-against-north-korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43182/most-americans-remain-opposed-to-authorizing-war-against-north-korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/most-americans-remain-opposed-to-authorizing-war-against-north-korea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The notion of American troops assisting the South Korean army is still endorsed by almost half of respondents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h5>The notion of American troops assisting the South Korean army is still endorsed by almost half of respondents.</h5>
<p>While the possibility of armed conflict breaking out in the Korean Peninsula is now less likely for Americans, about half of people in the United States believe the government should not authorize a military invasion of North Korea, a new Angus Reid Public Opinion poll has found.</p>
<p>The Government of South Korea has accused North Korea of using a torpedo to sink a ship in March, killing 46 South Korean sailors. North Korea has denied the allegations, and claims that South Korea manipulated the results of its own investigation.</p>
<p>In the online survey of a representative national sample of 1,013 American adults, 12 per cent of respondents believe it is “very likely” that a war will break out between the two Koreas in the next year, while 40 per cent deem this possibility as “moderately likely”. </p>
<p>Since late May, the proportion of respondents who believe a conflict in the Korean Peninsula is likely has dropped by seven points.</p>
<p>About 28,000 American troops are currently stationed in South Korea. In the event of a war, almost half of Americans (47%) would approve of the U.S. soldiers helping the South Korean military. Conversely, 36 per cent of respondents would oppose such involvement.</p>
<p>More than a third of Americans (36%) would support the U.S. government authorizing a military invasion of North Korea with the aim of removing the North Korean government. Almost half (46%) are against this course of action.</p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong></p>
<p>While the diplomatic tension in the Korean Peninsula has subsided as a concern for Americans, the views of respondents on how the U.S. should become engaged in an ultimate war remains unaffected. About half of Americans see no problem with American soldiers providing assistance to South Korea, but the same proportion rejects the idea of the U.S. authorizing a military invasion of North Korea with the aim of removing the North Korean government.</p>
<p>Republican Party supporters are more likely to support a military invasion of North Korea (47%) than Independents (36%) and Democrats (32%).</p>
<p><em>Our May 2010 survey on Tension in Korea can be accessed <a href="http://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/2010.06.03_Korea_USA.pdf">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.visioncritical.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/2010.08.19_Korea_USA.pdf">Full Report, Detailed Tables and Methodology (PDF)</a></p>
<h5>CONTACT:</h5>
<p>Mario Canseco, Vice President, Public Affairs<br />
+877 730 3570<br />
<a href="mailto:mario.canseco@angus-reid.com">mario.canseco@angus-reid.com</a></p>
<p><em>Methodology: From August 1 to August 2, 2010, Angus Reid Public Opinion conducted an online survey among 1,013 American adults who are Springboard America panelists. The margin of error—which measures sampling variability—is +/- 3.1%. The results have been statistically weighted according to the most current education, age, gender and region Census data to ensure a sample representative of the entire adult population of the United States. Discrepancies in or between totals are due to rounding.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43182/most-americans-remain-opposed-to-authorizing-war-against-north-korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Party Lines Mark Debate Over Korea in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39054/party_lines_mark_debate_over_korea_in_us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39054/party_lines_mark_debate_over_korea_in_us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/party_lines_mark_debate_over_korea_in_us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - The possibility of a new war in the Korean Peninsula is a concern for many Americans, but following the recent military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, the public is not particularly supportive of a new &#34;regime change&#34; operation.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span></p>
<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; The possibility of a new war in the Korean Peninsula is a concern for many Americans, but following the recent military interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan, the public is not particularly supportive of a new &quot;regime change&quot; operation.
</p>
<p>
Overall, 59 per cent of respondents think it is <a href="http://bit.ly/ccm4u4">&quot;very likely&quot; or &quot;moderately likely&quot;</a> that a war will break out between South Korea and North Korea in the next year. There is little fluctuation among Democrats, Republicans and Independents on this particular indicator.
</p>
<p>
U.S. President Barack Obama has made it clear that South Korea can count on the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/videotaped-remarks-president-obama-korea-society-2010-annual-dinner">full support of the U.S.</a> during this trying time. However, two possible scenarios for American collaboration get very different reviews from respondents.
</p>
<p>
The U.S. has about 28,000 troops stationed in South Korea, and almost half of Americans (47%) would approve of a plan that would see these soldiers providing assistance to South Korea if a war breaks out. Republicans (58%) and Independents (56%) are more likely to back this notion than Democrats (40%).
</p>
<p>
Support for the U.S. Government authorizing a military invasion of North Korea with the aim of removing the North Korean government stands at 35 per cent. While almost half of Republicans would agree to this scenario (48%), considerably fewer Independents (37%) and Democrats (30%) would be on board.
</p>
<p>
On a list of 19 different countries, only two&mdash;North Korea and Iran&mdash;are seen enemies of the United States by at least half of respondents. Pakistan, which was <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/InsideCover/hillary-clinton-pakistan-terror/2010/05/07/id/358274">subjected to a stern warning</a> last month by U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, is an enemy for 39 per cent of Americans.
</p>
<p>
At this point, Americans would support assistance to South Korea in the event of a war, but are clearly not in favour of an invasion to remove the communist regime.
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/39054/party_lines_mark_debate_over_korea_in_us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>People Predict Military Action in Iran in 2010s</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37932/people_predict_military_action_in_iran_in_2010s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37932/people_predict_military_action_in_iran_in_2010s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/people_predict_military_action_in_iran_in_2010s/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Citizens in three countries foresee a U.S.-backed military intervention in Iran in the next decade, according to a poll by Angus Reid Public Opinion. 58 per cent of respondents in Britain, 56 per cent of Canadians and 54 per cent of Americans regard this as a likely possibility.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span></p>
<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Citizens in three countries foresee a U.S.-backed military intervention in Iran in the next decade, according to a poll by Angus Reid Public Opinion. 58 per cent of respondents in Britain, 56 per cent of Canadians and 54 per cent of Americans regard this as a likely possibility.
</p>
<p>
In addition, a sizeable proportion of people in the three countries believe Vladimir Putin will be directly involved in the Russian government ten years from now, and at least three-in-ten think a U.S.-backed military intervention in North Korea will take place.
</p>
<p>
Less than one third of respondents in the three countries foresee Cuba abandoning communism, China having free and fair elections, and Israel and the Palestinians reaching a definite peace agreement.
</p>
<p>
After being branded as part of an &quot;axis of evil&quot; by then U.S. president George W. Bush in January 2002, Iran has contended that its nuclear program aims to produce energy, not weapons. Iran has been the target of three sets of United Nations (UN) sanctions for refusing to suspend uranium-enrichment work.
</p>
<p>
The United States and other Western powers have called on Iran to agree to a deal before the end of 2009 which would entail sending low-enriched uranium abroad for processing to turn it into fuel-making uranium.
</p>
<p>
On Dec. 23, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed both the deal and the deadline, adding. &quot;[U.S. president Barack Obama] extended the sanctions against us. He has failed to meet the expectations of the people in the U.S. and the people of the world.&quot;
</p>
<p>
U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice discussed the issue, saying, &quot;In the new year, absent some significant changes in the posture of Iran, I think we believe that the time will be ripe for serious consideration of additional pressures.&quot;
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
Do you think each of these is likely or unlikely to happen in the next 10 years? &#8211; &quot;Very likely&quot; and &quot;Moderately likely&quot; listed
</p>
<p></span></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7" width="none" dir="ltr">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="77%">&nbsp;</td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			<strong>CAN</strong>
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			<strong>USA</strong>
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			<strong>BRI</strong>
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			A U.S.-backed military intervention in Iran
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			56%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			54%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			58%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			Vladimir Putin will be directly involved in the Government of Russia
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			50%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			49%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			56%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			A U.S.-backed military intervention in North Korea
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			39%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			36%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			35%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			Cuba will abandon communism
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			32%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			26%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			24%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			China will have free and fair elections
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			17%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			20%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			18%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="77%"><span></p>
<p>
			Israel and the Palestinians reaching a definite peace agreement
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			17%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="8%"><span></p>
<p>
			18%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
<td width="7%"><span></p>
<p>
			15%
			</p>
<p>			</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span></p>
<p>
<em>Source: Angus Reid Public Opinion</em> <br />
<em>Methodology: Online interviews with 1,017 Canadian adults, 1,006 American adults, and 2,010 British adults, conducted from Dec. 15 to Dec. 17, 2009. Margins of error range from 2.2 per cent to 3.1 per cent.</em>
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://bit.ly/7paMeI">Complete Poll (PDF)</a>
</p>
<p><u><font color="#0000ff"></p>
<p>
&nbsp;
</p>
<p></font></u></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/37932/people_predict_military_action_in_iran_in_2010s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Korea Bigger Threat than Iran for Americans</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/36520/north_korea_bigger_threat_than_iran_for_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/36520/north_korea_bigger_threat_than_iran_for_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/north_korea_bigger_threat_than_iran_for_americans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - People in the United States think North Korea represents a bigger menace to their country than many other nations, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 38 per cent of respondents cite North Korea as the biggest threat to U.S. national security. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; People in the United States think North Korea represents a bigger menace to their country than many other nations, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 38 per cent of respondents cite North Korea as the biggest threat to U.S. national security.
</p>
<p>
China is second with 18 per cent, followed by Iran with 17 per cent, Pakistan with eight per cent, Afghanistan and Russia with three per cent each, and Iraq with two per cent.
</p>
<p>
Kim Jong-il has been the de-facto leader of North Korea since the death of his father, Kim Il Song, in 1994. North Korea was branded as part of an &quot;axis of evil&quot; by then U.S. president George W. Bush in January 2002. In February 2005, the government of North Korea admitted publicly for the first time that it possesses nuclear weapons.
</p>
<p>
In July 2006, North Korea launched seven missiles&mdash;including the Taepodong-2&mdash;which landed in the Sea of Japan close to Russian coastal areas. In October 2006, the country announced it had successfully carried out a test detonation of a nuclear weapon.
</p>
<p>
On Apr. 5, 2009, North Korea launched its long-range rocket, claiming it was used to place a satellite into orbit which is broadcasting &quot;immortal revolutionary songs&quot; and anthems praising Kim. On that same day, U.S. president Barack Obama declared: &quot;North Korea broke the rules once again by testing a rocket that could be used for long-range missiles. This provocation underscores the need for action.&quot;
</p>
<p>
On Jun. 25, Pak Pyong Jong, first vice chairman of the Pyongyang City People&rsquo;s Committee, told a crowd of hundreds of thousands that North Korea&rsquo;s &quot;armed forces will deal an annihilating blow that is unpredictable and unavoidable, to any sanctions or provocations by the U.S.,&quot; implying that this retaliation would include the use of nuclear weapons.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
Which country is a bigger threat to the National Security of the United States&hellip;..Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, China or Russia?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			North Korea
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			38%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			China
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			18%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Iran
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			17%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Pakistan
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			8%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Afghanistan
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			3%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Russia
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			3%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Iraq
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			2%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="68%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			Not sure
			</p>
</td>
<td width="32%" height="28" valign="middle">
<p>
			12%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<em>Source: Rasmussen Reports </em><br />
<em>Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 American likely voters, conducted on Jul. 1, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent. </em>
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/36520/north_korea_bigger_threat_than_iran_for_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Doubt UN Can Deal with North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35808/americans_doubt_un_can_deal_with_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35808/americans_doubt_un_can_deal_with_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/americans_doubt_un_can_deal_with_north_korea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many adults in the United States believe the United Nations (UN) Security Council will be unable to properly respond to North Korea&#8217;s recent missile launch, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. Only 34 per cent of respondents think effective action is likely to happen.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Many adults in the United States believe the United Nations (UN) Security Council will be unable to properly respond to North Korea&rsquo;s recent missile launch, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. Only 34 per cent of respondents think effective action is likely to happen.
</p>
<p>
Kim Jong-il has been the de-facto leader of North Korea since the death of his father, Kim Il Song, in 1994. North Korea was branded as part of an &quot;axis of evil&quot; by then U.S. president George W. Bush in January 2002. In February 2005, the government of North Korea admitted publicly for the first time that it possesses nuclear weapons.
</p>
<p>
In July 2006, North Korea launched seven missiles&mdash;including the Taepodong-2&mdash;which landed in the Sea of Japan close to Russian coastal areas. In October 2006, the country announced it had successfully carried out a test detonation of a nuclear weapon.
</p>
<p>
On Apr. 5, North Korea launched its long-range rocket, claiming it was used to place a satellite into orbit which is broadcasting &quot;immortal revolutionary songs&quot; and anthems praising Kim. On that same day, U.S. president Barack Obama declared: &quot;North Korea broke the rules once again by testing a rocket that could be used for long-range missiles. This provocation underscores the need for action.&quot;
</p>
<p>
The UN Security Council is in charge of maintaining peace and security between nations, issuing specific resolutions that governments must adhere to under the terms of the UN Charter. The internal organ currently has five permanent members&mdash;Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States&mdash;as well as 10 non-permanent members who are chosen for two-year terms.
</p>
<p>
On Apr. 13, all 15 members of the UN Security Council endorsed a statement that &quot;condemns&quot; the rocket launch, and deems it &quot;in contravention of Security Council Resolution 1718 of 2006,&quot; which banned any missile tests by North Korea.
</p>
<p>
North Korea&rsquo;s Foreign Ministry issued a communiqu&eacute;, which claims the UN &quot;rampantly&quot; infringes upon the country&rsquo;s sovereignty and states: &quot;We have no choice but to further strengthen our nuclear deterrent to cope with additional military threats by hostile forces. (&#8230;) The six-party talks that we are taking part in are not necessary any more.&quot;
</p>
<p>
The six-party talks&mdash;which involve China, Japan, North Korea, Russia, South Korea and the United States&mdash;started in 2003 and are aimed at seeking a resolution to the security concerns raised by North Korea&rsquo;s nuclear program.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
In response to North Korea&rsquo;s recent missile launch, how likely is it that the United Nations Security Council will take effective action against North Korea?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="74%">
<p>
			Very likely
			</p>
</td>
<td width="26%">
<p>
			8%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="74%">
<p>
			Somewhat likely
			</p>
</td>
<td width="26%">
<p>
			26%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="74%">
<p>
			Not very likely
			</p>
</td>
<td width="26%">
<p>
			36%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="74%">
<p>
			Not at all likely
			</p>
</td>
<td width="26%">
<p>
			23%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="74%">
<p>
			Not sure
			</p>
</td>
<td width="26%">
<p>
			7%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<em>Source: Rasmussen Reports</em> <br />
<em>Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 American adults, conducted on Apr. 7 and Apr. 8, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent.</em>
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35808/americans_doubt_un_can_deal_with_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans Ponder Action in North Korea</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35719/americans_ponder_action_in_north_korea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35719/americans_ponder_action_in_north_korea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/americans_ponder_action_in_north_korea/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many adults in the United States would agree to take military action to eliminate North Korea&#8217;s ability to launch missiles, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 57 per cent of respondents agree with this rationale.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Many adults in the United States would agree to take military action to eliminate North Korea&rsquo;s ability to launch missiles, according to a poll by Rasmussen Reports. 57 per cent of respondents agree with this rationale.
</p>
<p>
In addition, only 27 per cent of respondents would consent to the U.S. helping North Korea rebuild its economy if it abandons its nuclear weapons development program.
</p>
<p>
Kim Jong-il has been the de-facto leader of North Korea since the death of his father, Kim Il Song, in 1994. North Korea was branded as part of an &quot;axis of evil&quot; by then U.S. president George W. Bush in January 2002. In February 2005, the government of North Korea admitted publicly for the first time that it possesses nuclear weapons.
</p>
<p>
In July 2006, North Korea launched seven missiles&mdash;including the Taepodong-2&mdash;which landed in the Sea of Japan close to Russian coastal areas. In October 2006, the country announced it had successfully carried out a test detonation of a nuclear weapon.
</p>
<p>
On Apr. 3, U.S. president Barack Obama warned North Korea not to go ahead with a planned launch of a long-range rocket, declaring, &quot;Should North Korea decide to take this action, we will work with all interested partners in the international community to take appropriate steps to let North Korea know that they cannot threaten the safety and stability of other countries with impunity.&quot;
</p>
<p>
On Apr. 5, North Korea launched its long-range rocket, claiming it was used to place a satellite into orbit which is broadcasting &quot;immortal revolutionary songs&quot; and anthems praising Kim. On that same day, Obama declared: &quot;North Korea broke the rules once again by testing a rocket that could be used for long-range missiles. This provocation underscores the need for action.&quot;
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
If North Korea launches a long-range missile, should the United States take military action to eliminate North Korea&rsquo;s ability to launch missiles?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			Yes
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			57%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			No
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			15%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			Not sure
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			28%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
If North Korea abandons its nuclear weapons development program, should the United States help North Korea rebuild its economy?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			Yes
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			27%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			No
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			51%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="61%">
<p>
			Not sure
			</p>
</td>
<td width="39%">
<p>
			21%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>
<em>Source: Rasmussen Reports </em><br />
<em>Methodology: Telephone interviews with 1,000 American adults, conducted on Apr. 3 and Apr. 4, 2009. Margin of error is 3 per cent.</em>
</p>
<p>
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/35719/americans_ponder_action_in_north_korea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Japanese Concerned Over Military Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27972/japanese_concerned_over_military_attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27972/japanese_concerned_over_military_attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/japanese_concerned_over_military_attack/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - The vast majority of people in Japan think their country remains vulnerable to outside aggression, according to a poll by the Cabinet Office. 80.2 per cent of respondents are very or moderately concerned about the possibility of a military attack. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; The vast majority of people in Japan think their country remains vulnerable to outside aggression, according to a poll by the Cabinet Office. 80.2 per cent of respondents are very or moderately concerned about the possibility of a military attack.
</p>
<p>
In September 2006, Shinzo Abe became the new leader of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and Japan&rsquo;s 90th prime minister. Abe vowed to &quot;make Japan into a country full of vitality, opportunities and kindness.&quot;
</p>
<p>
Abe resigned on Sept. 10. His tenure was affected by allegations of corruption, massive clerical errors within the Social Insurance Agency (SIA), embarrassing statements by several cabinet members, and the suicide of agriculture minister Toshikatsu Matsuoka.
</p>
<p>
On Sept. 23, Yasuo Fukuda, a 71-year-old moderate who favours closer ties with Asia, was elected as the new LDP leader. Yesterday, Fukuda was officially sworn in as Japan&rsquo;s prime minister.
</p>
<p>
In July 2006, North Korea launched seven missiles&mdash;including the Taepodong-2&mdash;which landed in the Sea of Japan close to Russian coastal areas. In October 2006, the country announced it had successfully carried out a test detonation of a nuclear weapon.
</p>
<p>
On Sept. 24, Kim Yon Chull, a policy researcher at Seoul&rsquo;s Korea University, said he believes Fukuda could ease relations with North Korea, adding, &quot;North Korea may expect a Fukuda government to refrain from acting harshly. In fact, the North may even expect a new premier to play a positive role in the six-nation talks.&quot;
</p>
<p>
The five nations engaged in negotiations to dismantle North Korea&rsquo;s nuclear facilities&mdash;as promised by the government in Pyongyang&mdash;are the United States, China, Japan, Russia and South Korea.
</p>
<p>
<strong>Polling Data</strong>
</p>
<p>
Are you concerned about the possibility of a military attack against Japan?
</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7" width="330">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>
			Very concerned / Moderately concerned
			</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>
			80.2%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>
			Not too concerned / Not concerned at all
			</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>
			19.8%
			</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em></p>
<p>
<em>Source: Cabinet Office <br />
Methodology: Interviews with 1,805 Japanese adults, conducted from Aug. 2 to Aug. 12, 2007. No margin of error was provided.</em>
</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27972/japanese_concerned_over_military_attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russians Fear U.S. Anti-Missile System</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27527/russians_fear_us_anti_missile_system/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27527/russians_fear_us_anti_missile_system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/russians_fear_us_anti_missile_system/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<span>(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Most people in </span><span>Russia</span><span> are concerned about a defence program the </span><span>United States</span><span> is planning to implement in </span><span>Central Europe</span><span>, according to a poll by the </span><span>Yury</span><span> </span><span>Levada</span><span> </span><span>Analytical</span><span> </span><span>Center</span><span>. 60 per cent of respondents think the </span><span>U.S.</span><span> anti-missile system represents more of a threat to </span><span>Russia</span><span> than </span><span>Iran</span><span>&#8217;s nuclear program or </span><span>North Korea</span><span>&#8217;s nuclear weapons.</span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Most people in Russia are concerned about a defence program the United States is planning to implement in Central Europe, according to a poll by the Yury Levada Analytical Center. 60 per cent of respondents think the U.S. anti-missile system represents more of a threat to Russia than Iran&rsquo;s nuclear program or North Korea&rsquo;s nuclear weapons.</p>
<p>In December 2002, U.S. president George W. Bush announced plans for the development of initial defence capabilities, which include ground-based and sea-based missile interceptors, as well as sensors located in space. Washington has explained the project as a means to defend the U.S. and its European allies from a potential attack by Iran or North Korea.</p>
<p>In January, the U.S. issued a formal request to place a missile defence radar base in the Czech Republic&mdash;in a military area southwest of Prague&mdash;as well as 10 interceptor missiles in Poland.</p>
<p>Russian president Vladimir Putin has repeatedly voiced concerns over the defence plan, claiming it is unnecessary and represents a threat to his country&rsquo;s national security.</p>
<p>On Aug. 24, Yuri Balyuevsky, the Russian military&rsquo;s chief of staff, told a Czech delegation of diplomats their government should not commit to the American plan until the 2008 U.S. presidential election takes place, adding, &quot;There are unfounded allegations that Russia is attempting to disrupt the peace and tranquillity of Western Europe.&quot;</p>
<p><strong>Polling Data</strong></p>
<p>Which of the following represents the greatest threat to Russia?</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="7" width="261">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>U.S. missile defence system</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>60%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>Iran&rsquo;s nuclear program</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>8%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>North Korea&rsquo;s nuclear weapons</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>8%</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="83%">
<p>Hard to answer</p>
</td>
<td width="17%">
<p>24%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><em><br />
<address></address>
<address>Source: Yury Levada Analytical Center</address>
<address>Methodology: Interviews with 1,600 Russian adults, conducted from Aug. 10 to Aug. 13, 2007. No margin of error was provided.</address>
<address></address>
<address></address>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/27527/russians_fear_us_anti_missile_system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Opposition to Missile Shield Still Strong in Poland</title>
		<link>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/273/opposition_to_missile_shield_still_strong_in_poland/</link>
		<comments>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/273/opposition_to_missile_shield_still_strong_in_poland/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/opposition_to_missile_shield_still_strong_in_poland/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Polish adults have not changed their minds about their country's participation in a defence plan proposed by the United States, according to a poll by CBOS. 56 per cent of respondents oppose the deployment of an anti-missile shield on their soil, up one point since July.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><P>(Angus Reid Global Monitor) &#8211; Polish adults have not changed their minds about their country&#8217;s participation in a defence plan proposed by the United States, according to a poll by CBOS. 56 per cent of respondents oppose the deployment of an anti-missile shield on their soil, up one point since July.</P><P>In December 2002, U.S. president George W. Bush announced plans for the development of initial defence capabilities, which include ground-based and sea-based missile interceptors, as well as sensors located in space. Washington has explained the project as a means to defend the U.S. and its European allies from a potential attack by Iran or North Korea.</P><P>In January, the U.S. issued a formal request to place a missile defence radar base in the Czech Republic&mdash;in a military area southwest of Prague&mdash;as well as 10 interceptor missiles in Poland. The plan has sparked an angry reaction from the Russian government, which sees it as a threat to its own national security.</P><P>Poland&#8217;s current president and prime minister&mdash;Lech Kaczynski and Jaroslaw Kaczynski&mdash;support Poland&#8217;s participation in the defence plan. The terms of the agreement are still under negotiation and are expected to be finalized by the end of this year. Poland is expected to hold a new legislative election in October.</P><P>On Aug. 23, Austria&#8217;s defence minister Norbert Darabos called the American anti-missile plan a &#8220;provocation&#8221; that could spark a new arms race in the region, adding, &#8220;The U.S. has chosen the wrong path in my opinion. There is no point in building up a missile defence shield in Europe. That only unnecessarily rekindles old Cold War debates.&#8221;</P><P><STRONG>Polling Data</STRONG></P><P>Do you support or oppose the deployment of an anti-missile shield in Poland?</P><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=7 width=none border=0><TR><TD width="23%"><STRONG> </STRONG></TD><TD width="27%"><P><STRONG>Aug. 2007</STRONG></P></TD><TD width="24%"><P><STRONG>Jul. 2007 </STRONG></P></TD><TD width="25%"><P><STRONG>Jun. 2007</STRONG></P></TD></TR><TR><TD width="23%"><P>Support</P></TD><TD width="27%"><P>28%</P></TD><TD width="24%"><P>28%</P></TD><TD width="25%"><P>26%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD width="23%"><P>Oppose</P></TD><TD width="27%"><P>56%</P></TD><TD width="24%"><P>55%</P></TD><TD width="25%"><P>60%</P></TD></TR><TR><TD width="23%"><P>Not sure</P></TD><TD width="27%"><P>16%</P></TD><TD width="24%"><P>17%</P></TD><TD width="25%"><P>14%</P></TD></TR></TABLE><I><P>Source: CBOS<BR>Methodology: Interviews with 859 Polish adults, conducted from Aug. 3 to Aug. 6, 2007. Margin of error is 3.2 per cent.<BR></P></I></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/273/opposition_to_missile_shield_still_strong_in_poland/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

